dean blackketter
2003-02-22 13:01:02 UTC
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN">
<head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>RE: Incremental scanning -- was Re: [slimp3-dev]
Re: [</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Dean - how about 25/sec default? I don't
think that should be a problem<br>
even with a slow disk, and wouuldn't be too painful for a moderately
sized</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>collection.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Fine by me. The speed is actually the amount of time
between invocations, (i.e. the timer is set at the end of each
iteration.)</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>One more thing... The animation still gets choppy during
scanning. Backgrounding the directory opening would probably
help this.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>-dean</div>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>
<head><style type="text/css"><!--
blockquote, dl, ul, ol, li { padding-top: 0 ; padding-bottom: 0 }
--></style><title>RE: Incremental scanning -- was Re: [slimp3-dev]
Re: [</title></head><body>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>Dean - how about 25/sec default? I don't
think that should be a problem<br>
even with a slow disk, and wouuldn't be too painful for a moderately
sized</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite" cite>collection.</blockquote>
<div><br></div>
<div>Fine by me. The speed is actually the amount of time
between invocations, (i.e. the timer is set at the end of each
iteration.)</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>One more thing... The animation still gets choppy during
scanning. Backgrounding the directory opening would probably
help this.</div>
<div><br></div>
<div>-dean</div>
<div><br></div>
</body>
</html>